Censorship in music is a topic that has brought about much controversy over the past two decades. There have been many different arguments on the topic, however the question still lingers is should censorship still remain. Before you can form an opinion on this, you must hear both sides of the argument on this much-debated topic. Some people believe that music should be censored so all audiences can hear it without it containing any offensive lyrics. Others believe it should not be censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap, or rhyme freely without anyone censoring them. "Whether a person finds a work obscene depends largely on his or her moral or religious beliefs. These views change with each generation and further complicate the censorship dilemma." (Censorship by, Bradley Steffens page 97) Religious or moral beliefs have a great influence on how a person feels about censorship, and as we evolve, common beliefs may change. Right now, America is more uncensored than ever. However, things were very different a few decades ago. Some people believe music should be censored. They believe some of the language musical artists use is vulgar, obscene, and crude. Also the fact that music is played on Medias such as radio and television, which are free to all audiences, and there are many parents who wish for their kids to not hear foul language. So on radio and television any controversial language is either silenced, edited, or some artists make two versions of their songs; one that is made for the album, and one for television and radio. "Preventing or punishing speech is a clear violation of the First Amendment." (Censorship. Opposing Viewpoints by, Greehaven Press page 147). "When you really think about it, it is a violation of the First Amendment, which says: "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press."" (www.anti-riaa.com/forum/shl_ID614021) The First Amendment guarantees the right...
