n the household actively and the household was presented as an economic system. The explanation that we gave was that these people were immigrants from Asia Minor and they were open in new ideas(males = females) so the interaction between them was different. This is a similarity as we see with Tasos and Efi, because it is alike the way that they are operating within the household.In addition to all this in the article that was titled Sisters in Christ we see many similarities and differences. We see that there is a distinction within the household and it involves the attribution of the household to women and the attribution of the economy to men; this is something that is not happening today that much since women are contributing financially in the household too. Also we see that the women were moving to their husbands house and they were taking their husbands name which is something that is not happening now because women are independent economically so they need to use their name in their job. Some things of these still exist and others do not. For example Efi after she got married she took Tasos name too and now she has two last names. She had to do like this because she is an independent person economically and has a work of her own, which requires her name for example to take some money from the bank. When the matter comes to the household and how it operates the roles of the couple are changing because as I mentioned before nowadays women are independent economically which means that they have the least more freedom. So all these have as a result the involvement of the husband in the household and the change of the womans role in the workplace. Finally, after all this analysis we see that the roles of the two genders are changing and that women are becoming more and more independent. But on the other hand men are becoming more thoughtful about matters that involve the household, which is something that is going to benefi...
