e the one in the first situation. This helps us to find an ethical solution to more complicated circumstances. One can wonder how these situations can possibly reflect how we think about other issues more related to our lives. As the article explains, if we use the "decision criteria"(1) like "how do I feel about what I just did"(1), we make practical and reasonable decisions, which in the same time are also ethical. Second of all, there is not enough information to support the article's generalization and conclusion. It is more generalized than specific, and it challenges the readers to arrive with their own answers to their own terms and "decision criteria." The article is very short, and it has a big effect on what is included in it. The conclusion of this article is more the invitation to IMA conference about ethics than giving specific answers to the questions asked in each of the three situations. In addition, I think that the article is very persuasive because although not in the direct but in the indirect way it makes the readers to believe that the ethical solution is the best solution. It stretches the fact that the decision that one makes and proudly shares with others is usually an ethical decision. On the other hand, we can conclude that the decision that one makes in the hopes that no one will find out is usually an unethical decision. As I have said, although the article is persuasive, it is also very general.Third of all, in the article the language was clearly presented; however, the organization was a little bit tricky. The language presented certainly was clear for the general reader. Indeed, anyone easily could read this article without any problems. I do not think that it could be too simple for an expert because an expert could ask himself more questions or analyze the article more deeply than the ordinary reader. Despite this, the organization plan was not clear and easy to follow at the b...
