e not to work or to be detrimental? If Burger King is successful, all employees will benefit, from Adamson down. In particular, the middle to lower level employees will benefit the most. They receive nice offices and they enjoy a much more relaxed work environment. However, if the change is not successful Adamson along with middle to lower level employees will suffer the most. The dress code will go back into effect, top management will go back to the top offices and communication between the two will become nonexistent. 3) Do you think that the changes at Burger King will enable it to remain successful? Why or why not? What other changes might you suggest?I feel the changes made at Burger King will enable them to be successful. I feel that a more open relaxed environment allows for a happier work place. In addition, the happier your employee's are the better they will perform for the company. I also feel that communication between top management and their subordinates is important, ideas can come from were you least expect it and it is important to recognize those ideas know mater what level of management they come from. Moreover, other changes that Burger King might want to try may be giving stock to their employees. I feel this is a good way to bring the employees into the company. Instead of just working for Burger King they would become part owners and they would try that much harder, because know one wants their own business to fail. Additional ProblemsI think the main problem is that the business keeps changing hands, and they can not seem to keep their top management team intact. Burger King needs to decide what is important to them and they must be willing to keep their top officials happy. If they can manage to do this, they might be able to come up with the proper marketing strategy to catch McDonalds. Updated Information Burger King CEO James B. Adamson did change the overall strategy to get the c...
