Paper Details  
 
   

Has Bibliography
7 Pages
1650 Words

 
   
   
    Filter Topics  
 
     
   
 

Stanley Deetz

often have say in how the decisions are made. If all of these stakeholders were represented at once, who knows what would happen, but Deetz thinks that would be ok. To think that this is the reality of the corporate world would be to agree with Deetz in this aspect of participation. I do not personally agree with this. If all of these stakeholders were to come together, I think that it would be a tragedy. Although many of them do have the same views on how the corporation should be run, there is always the person that disagrees.Stanley Deetz has created a theory that has many truths to it, that most corporate employees would take as a surprise. They do not want to know that this is the reality of their world. What kind of person would want to know that they are being controlled by the people that give them the opportunity to make a living? Most people already realize it. Although most people do not have much of a choice in the matter, I think that most would continue with what they are doing. What is the difference between working at PriceWaterHouseCoopers and Chili’s restaurant, besides the major salary difference. I work at Chili’s, a large corporation with so many rules that you would think I was making more than $2.83 an hour (excluding tips). They dictate the way I communicate to customers, the way I dress and the style of my attire and how I look. They don’t give the impression that work comes before family, but they do expect me to pay them for the meals I eat while at work.Overall, Stanley Deetz has made many good points in evaluating how a corporation is organized. If only people would break away from the corporation, but this is the way we made it, the way our world is run, and it will never be the same again....

< Prev Page 5 of 7 Next >

    More on Stanley Deetz...

    Loading...
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2025 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA