e new currency. In short, all unemployment which followed so far on statist measures to end inflation was due to the remaining state interventions particularly with the monetary sphere and interventions with private work, sales and purchase contracts. III SOME CONCLUSIONS Obviously most people do not know how to stop inflation without causing still more unemployment or how to stop unemployment without causing inflation What can one expect under such circumstances? People's minds are so full of errors myths and prejudices on the subject that they are not even willing to listen patiently to explanations of the truth on the subject, Only experimental freedom offers a way out. Let those who know better - or who believe that they do - demonstrate at their expense and risk, and also for their own benefit only, that they are right. The others would be free to imitate the successful techniques at any time. In short: Let good money drive out the bad: Let the people provide as much good money as is needed to bring about all desired exchanges at free market prices. People are not willing to listen to mere theoretical explanations because they already presume to know all the answers required (or that their experts know them for them): It has to be either inflation or unemployment, according to them - and so they end up saddling us with both. No wonder then that a science presumed to leave us only the choice between two evils is not very popular, is rather regarded as a "dismal" science, still. Nevertheless, these ignorant people pretend to be "realists" while they practise their coercive, immoral, inefficient and contradictory systems based on myths, and they look down on anyone who would point out the flaws as a utopist or theorizer, dreamer or money crank, while, paradoxically, they do not grant him experimental freedom to "cure" him of his "errors". (Admittedly, most of the alternative proposals are as bad or even worse than the present system.)...
