Paper Details  
 
   

Has Bibliography
3 Pages
674 Words

 
   
   
    Filter Topics  
 
     
   
 

None Provided8

me of the other games it had to offer, and I must say that almost all of them are not very good. They are so plain and have no excitement to them, and excitement is the key to a good game, in my opinion. There are a lot of different web sights where there are better games such as, www.candystand.com, www.games.com, and a few others that I will go on the computer just to play. With these games on flasharcade.com they are just not fun to play and I defiantly would not go there again. I don’t want to totally tear the web sight apart but it could have been thought out a lot better, and the games could have been a little more appealing. As for the copyrights and such it is very well marked. At the bottom of every game it states the copyrights. It says that any copying or republishing is illegal.The appearance of the sight is the only thing it has going for itself. If I would have just opened up the sight and not played any of the games I would have thought that the games are cool just by the looks of the web sight, but that didn’t appear to be the case. Once I played a game it wasn’t all over yet, I still had hope that it was just my game, but when I got to playing some of the others that is what made my mind up that this really is not a good “games” web sight. In all the sight just wasn’t too good. I didn’t like how, in my opinion the games are not fun, after all isn’t that what games are for. ...

< Prev Page 2 of 3 Next >

    More on None Provided8...

    Loading...
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2025 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA