r program, however, is the racial implications of it. Some people believe that because the schools can now be chosen, the "melting pot" environment of public school will no longer exist, instead vouchers will only be a flashback to the vouchers that were used by the white community to avoid integration. However, Friedman assures that this will not be so. Instead he feels that since children will be grouped into schools based upon common interests, like arts or sciences, whatever the school specializes in, they will look past racial implications and would be a step in the right direction for civil rights. Another question of the school voucher program is whether or not the students would be permitted to use thir vouchers at parochial schools, and whether that would violate the first amendment. Obviously this issue would have to be settled in court, however Bush compred the school voucher system to the "GI Bill for kids" and no problems were ever brought up with any of the veterans who attended religious colleges. Friedman believes however, that despite the many questions and conflicts the voucher program would make public and private schools a safer place to send your children. By grouping children by schools of interest, you are more likely to have children who want to go to school, and are therefore less likely to cause problems.Milton Friedman is known mostly as the anti-Keynesian. This is mostly in reference to the Phillip's Curve, or the inflation-unemployment trade-off, which is the Keynesian model that depicts the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, namely when inflation goes up unemployment will go down. This theory helped to add some signification to inflation, recognizing that is had a purpose. However, Milton Friedman came along in the 60's and 70's and proved there were many points that just did not fit along this curve, in which both unemployment and inflation were high. These points fell far to the rig...
