out out numerous promises and allegations towards the opposing force. The party decides upon a candidate based on speaking ability, charisma, and mild temper, not on wether or not he has strong personal views and a clear consciousness of the nation’s needs. The one thing I can not understand is , with both political parties leaning towards wealthier families with education, social assistance, and healthcare, why can they still gain so many votes when the majority of people are not in the top tax bracket. Is it because lower class eligible voters have a lower percentage of people voting and that most higher class voters do make it to the voting booth.Now is the time to think, how many of these promises is the president going to follow through with. Take Gore for instance, he promises to use $432 billion to improve the Medicare program, and yet he plans to cut taxes by $480 billion, while also eliminating the debt by 2012. How on earth can he do this, he is putting money into the healthcare, getting less money back, and also reducing a bill of trillions of dollars. Enough said, but what about his counterpart Bush, he makes the same hollow promises that president have been making for years, but also says no to more things than he says yes to. He opposes abortion, employee non-discrimination act, same-sex marriage, global warning agreement, and countless others. Who to vote for is as difficult as buying a house. Of course one of the first things you look for when buying a house is the age and style. Bush being the elder of the two may look more promising because he has had a little more experience and has a better foundation of what the people want. But sometimes you do not want the standard old house, with its strong foundation and equally strong role in the community. But old houses also have a lot of pests and even more up keeping to take care of, is that what Americans really want? Gore on the other hand maybe a little more open m...
