he receivers is another objection to the current welfare system. Doctors and insurance companies may purposefully charge higher rates for people on welfare, depending on the poor persons ignorance and the governments willingness to foot the bill for their success (Segalman 178). Though this fraud is regulated, it has occurred and will occur despite regulation. Some also believe that welfare encourages a form of fraud among some of the poor who receive the aid. They believe that the guidelines and formulas set up by the government encourage poor persons to lie about there health and income, and even to have extra children in order to receive more money from the government. These problems are difficult to blame solely on the welfare system, and are also nearly impossible to effectively regulate and eliminate. Another issue that some people take with the welfare system has nothing to do with how it operates, but simply the fact that it is allowed to operate at all. These people point to the constitution, which does not allow the federal government this right and gives all powers not delegated to the federal government to the states. The belief that social programs should be administrated by state and local, rather than federal government is not new. Some people agree with the conclusion of this groupthat the federal government should not be involved with welfarebut have differing reasons. They say that welfare should be administered by the states simply because it would be more efficient, not for any constitutional objection. The problems in setting up a welfare system are similar to the problems of running the actual program. These problems include the two previous questionsWho gets assistance? and How much do they receive?and another one; Who is going to figure out the answers to the first questions and apply those answers to the benefit of the poor?. Therefore, the problem in organizing a welfare system comes down to the question of the...
