rad’s style ofwriting, in which it stated: “It is obvious that, while Conrad never formulated any rules, he wasforever trying out new methods, hitting upon this or that new procedure, itmay be, by instinct rather than by deliberation; but it was the instinct of aman profoundly concerned with method, forever on the lookout for somenew way of cheating oblivion and saving his chosen art from the dry-rot ofmonotony and academicism.” (TCLC 199) Works CitedBrytonski, Dedria, and Phyllis C. Mendelson, eds. Twentieth Century Literary Criticism. Vol. 1 Detroit: Hale Research Co., 1978.Dintenfass, Mark. “Heart of Darkness: A Lawrence University Freshman Studies Lecture.” 14Mar. 1996. *http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~csicseri/dintenfass.htm* (2 Feb. 2000).Draper, James P., ed. World Literature Criticism: 1500 to the Present. Vol. 2 Detroit: GaleResearch Inc., 1992.Hamblin, Stephen. “Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Agent.” *http://www.ductape.net/~steveh/secretagent/* (2 Feb. 2000).The Hutchinson Encyclopedia. 1999. 2 Feb. 1999. *http://ukdb.web.aol.com/hutchinson/encyclopedia/72/M0013572.htmMagill, Frank N., ed. 1,300 Critical Evaluations of Selected Novels and Plays. Vol. 2 Englewood Cliffs: Salem Press Inc., 1976.Stein, Rita, and Martin Tucker, eds. Modern British Literature. Vol. 4 New York: FrederickUngar Publishing Co., 1975. ...
