d poor knowledge of science.” (Touponce) It is ironic that his generic logic of antinomies never allows him to consider the possibility that Bradbury’s surrational imaginings to use a phrase coined by Gaston Bachelard that Andre Breton employed when he discussed surrealism’s relationships to scientific knowledge. Bradbury’s work should be studied for its rich imaginative vision, and then for the way in which it links up with the larger literary movements of the twentieth century. In short, at the current state of our knowledge of this genre and how it demands to be read, everyone is his own Aristotle. (Touponce)The Martian Chronicles portrays the colonization and destruction of the nearly mystical and telepathic Martian civilization by waves of Earthmen, is not to be understood as a simple reflection of social and economical conditions. The writing can be seen in sudden fissures that accompany them. Craftily observing that many works of science fiction ostensibly about the future seem to offer us a retrospective glance as well. Carrouges explains that Bradbury’s Martian Chronicles expresses that guilt of the twentieth century’s destruction of exotic and primitive civilizations. (Touponce)John J. McLaughlin wrote that “much of the bulk of Bradbury’s fiction has been concerned with a single theme-the loss of human values to the machine.” This becomes apparent in The Martian Chronicles. Bradbury deals with, ”the initial attempts to successfully establish a footing on Mars.” chronicled, ”the rise and fall of the Mars colony” (Jennifer Hicks)Bradbury shows his deepest honesty and courage in making so implicit and unmistakable a criticism of the destructive forces he sees about his own land. Certainly he has pictured a place so awful, so replete with destruction, that as readers, we want no part of it. We can imagine easily that Bradbury is responding not only to h...
