et. It is a changing point in his life and a turning point in his thinking. I commented about how I liked Alec more than Wallace, my mother agreed. In this short story, Wallace represents science and Alec represents humanity. Alec did not hunt to greaten the world’s grasp on conceptual thinking and amazing theories. Alec hunted for the majority of his life because he enjoyed it. I wanted Alec to do well and beat Wallace. Alec is the “underdog.“ He is not as skilled, and does not stand for the “noble” cause of science. My mother elaborated on this subject more. She liked Alec better, and that led to thinking about him being more connected to the natural world as belonging to it rather than studying it. Although neither Wallace nor Alec was an evil in the book, I tended to hope for Alec to succeed. This is only my point of view. Someone else could find Wallace a much more likable character. It really depends on what you like in a person, and idea or even a book. Something's are not always what they seem to be. When I look for a book I find a good guide to finding a good book is finding a good title. I think you should never judge a book by its cover, but by its title may not be a bad idea....
