s comparison is again evident, the novelist is still a God, since he creates (pg.82). In addition, Fowles does not understand that in much of his views, he is speaking on behalf of thousands of authors, which possibly will find his comments rather offending. Fowles casually states, We also know that a genuinely created world(a world that fully reveals its planning) is a dead world, which again proves his increasingly opposing ideas on determinism. Fowles even attempts to define God, There is only one good definition of God: The freedom that allows other freedoms to exist. And I must conform to that definition, (pg.82)....
