can win. If you accidentally bump into someone and accidentally touch them that’s one thing but being sued for it that’s just ridiculous. Doloff goes on to say how this happened to her, she was working and her boss pinched her butt and he claimed he was on medication and couldn’t be blamed. One time is ok because it was an accident but when it happens a second time like in Doloff’s case then its sexual harassment. Also in Hayward’s essay he talks about looking at a women wrongly might get you sued, but you could have been day dreaming and it just so happened she’s in the line of sight. This brings up the case of why women sue and what they gain from it. Women sue cause they know they can win and get a big settlement. Hayward said in his essay that women dress provocatively and that they will also draw the non targeted attention. Like he said women show their cleavage to be admired and then when a man looks at them they get mad. You see more female sexual harassment cases then male sexual harassment cases, why because with women they know if they sue a male employee for sexual harassment its almost a guaranteed win for them and that means large settlement. Overall no one has a definite definition for sexual harassment or name an exact price or punishment for the act. How do we go about to stop the fraudulent lawsuits and complaints? Maybe having stricter sexual harassment laws, also I know more corporations are having seminars and videos on the awareness of sexual harassment. I have to strongly disagree with the way Marton suggests that her executive escort was sexually harassing her for two reasons. One reason is that she had a choice of whether or not to go up to the hotel room with him. Also her escort did not try anything all he did was simply talk, he might have chosen the wrong place to talk but nonetheless he did not try anything sexual or in a demeanor fashion. But in the situati...
