s views as to what type of businesswas going to operate the water systems. For the most part, the idea of privatization was ondebate. If privatization of the water companies did occur, people would get a safe andreliable source of drinking water, and not some huge corporation just trying to make a profit. That would mean that safe water would flow whenever a tap is turned on and that wasteswould go away when a toilet is flushed. ConclusionIn conclusion, these two articles explained much about Canadian identity and how itcan change, depending on the region and the situation. It shows, especially, how the regionscan change when disasters occur and how the nation can get involved to help that region. The articles about the Walkerton tragedy was covered by both the Globe and Mail and theToronto Star and also by CBC. Its predominant coverage was by the regional media,mainly because it had the most local concern. Although, in all of the coverages, the concernsof the government and the people were voiced and they gave their suggestions on how toremedy the problem. It was obvious that the whole country felt a concern for the Walkerton tragedy. Canada can definitely say that it learned from the situation, and it shows by the nationalcoverage. It was like everyone was trying to help, no matter where they lived. Canada isconsidered a national community, that spreads from sea to sea....