ard arguments that the death penalty was not a deterrent, that those executed were usually the poor and disadvantaged, and that innocent people had been sentenced to death. "The same arguments are being made today," said Eugene G. Wanger, who had introduced the language to enshrine a ban on capital punishment in Michigan's constitution at that convention (Bonner & Fessenden). Research has indicates that a significant of people who are not for capital punishment belief that it violates their rights and that its a cruel action, they feel strongly of their sets of morals. In which their punishment are unfair and injustice to the victims who have had their rights violated either by a physically or mentally abused. Most of these people vote against capital punishment for the moral issue, saying that we are civilized people compared to other countries. Should we let these people with good and nice moral say that it wrong to put to death a criminal that committed an illegal act free for their wrong doing.Reason like the one above is why a small percentage of our population is for capital punishment. They see as a control in our society. By having this control they believe that it will change our local community and lower crimes rate in our country. Also they try to set standard moral, saying that its not right to commit an illegal act and get away with it. In which a lot of criminals do by having a flow of money in their bank accounts, or by pleading that their insane, or by saying that there not guilty of the crime where by the judge view sees then not-guilty of the crime that was committed. And if the judges see them as innocent they have some how cheated the system that been corrupted so may of time by the people. Which leads to why our system must be revised to view both sides, to where the punishment is not as harsh and that the victims seeks justice for the crime that was committed by another person, this way it pleases both groups. The...
