Paper Details  
 
   

Has Bibliography
3 Pages
837 Words

 
   
   
    Filter Topics  
 
     
   
 

Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint

ial restraint.Conclusively, I believe our judicial branch should remain restrained. I believe that the U.S. Supreme Court should not meddle with the affairs brought up by neither the other branches of government nor by the general public. I also believe that if the judicial branch, by staying away from politics, is in the rightful position to save the country from political embarrassment, such as the verdict of Bush v. Gore, when the United States could not even decide whom her leader would be. Furthermore, if a case regarding the actions of the executive branch during the period after the tragic incident of September 11th, I feel that the judicial branch should back the President and his decision, so people of other nations would consider our country to be very united. Finally, I think that by being restrained, any decision that is made is more justified, because the decision of prior courts had prove that its verdict has indeed sour the social justice of civil liberty....

< Prev Page 3 of 3 Next >

    More on Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint...

    Loading...
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2025 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA