must relocate or close. By this intention, the city is taking the property from the owners and zoning it for the public good. The NYAEE should file suit to be justly compensated under the Taking Clause.It is not of this firm's duty to defend the content to which the adult entertainment enterprise profits from, it is the firm's duty to apply to law set by the Constitution to protect the property rights of all owners of private property. The impact of the adult entertainment establishment may well have effected "the decrease in property values of surrounding business and residents. This would involve further study before a direct connection could be established and give reason for a action by the city in the form of regulation. It is less clear whether the adult entertainment commercial business effects "an increase in crime and a decline in economic and pedestrian activities. It would seem that if the adult entertainment businesses were profiting by customer demand and sales were up, the economic status of the area would be in positive territory. Also, if customers are buying into the products of the adult entertainment industry, as well they must, to have such an enormous variety of successful departments areas of concern, the customers would have to walk into the shops unless they are all drive-thru buildings. Therefore, the must be some type of pedestrian activity. It is of the recommendation of this lawyer that the action of the Department of City Planning in regulating the properties of the NYAEE owners has violated the vested rights of private property ownership. The NYAEE property owners affected by the regulations should file a law suit against the city for the compensation of the property acquired by the government regulations....
