r examining the film one could tell that the president's head had not struck some fixed object in the limo, nor had his wife grabbed him to try to pull him to safety. Could it have been a nuero-muscular reaction as many have questioned? "Not even close." Says UCLA physics professor A.J. Riddle. "Even if this bullet did excite some nerve impulse of the brain, the body would not react as the president's had but would merely cause the body to go limp." (Klaidman, p.32) The only explanation that can logically be made is that some outside force must of caused Kennedy's body to react as it did. Somewhere in between Zapruder frames 312 314, the President had been shot again. One shot had been fired from the rear (causing the forward movement); the second shot had been fired from in front of the President, somewhere to his right. If one were to stand at the exact location where the president was fatally shot, behind you stands the Texas Depository Building, where Oswald fired his shots from. To the right and in front of you stands a wooden fence on the edge of a grassy knoll. This is from where the second gunman fired his shot(s).After the Warren Commission questioned witnesses who stood near the presidential limousine on November 22, 1963 an amazing number of people (over 120) said that they thought the shots were being fired from the rear of the grassy knoll to the right of the presidential limousine. (Associated Press, p.2) How then could the Warren Commission think that we would accept the theory that Oswald acted alone? That is absurd, the only mathematic, logical, and correct answer is that more than one gunman was amidst the crowd that afternoon in Dallas. This hastily made conclusion by the Warren Commission seemed almost to have an ulterior motive of some sort. What was this ulterior motive behind the governments conclusion regarding the John F. Kennedy assassination? We may never know, however, researching of this ...
