d not have been broken but I think that because they were used together they broke stalemate and in turn ended the war. I also feel it was the entering of new allies, mainly the U.S, which helped the most in breaking stalemate. Then it was 'new weaponry' and then 'frontal assault'. The two least factors, which I think did not really help the breaking of stalemate, were 'the war at sea' and 'other fronts'. It is because the new allies brought in new supplies and more men which enabled the Allies to give a good counter-attack on the German offensive. I think without the new allies the Allied force would not have been strong enough to break stalemate and then win the war. However without the 'new weaponry' and the 'frontal assaults' they could not have held the stalemate. The other two factors I feel had no major impact and without them the war would have been no different. Rakesh Patel CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO BREAKING THE DEADLOCK ON THE WESTERN FRONT:(A) FRONTAL ASSUALT(B) NEW WEAPONARY(C) THE WAR AT SEA(D) OTHER FRONTS(E) NEW ALLIESHOW FAR DO THESE EXPLAIN ENDING THE STALEMATE BY 1918?...
