g to become the aristocratic class. They acted as though they were elite, and ended up looking like they were pathetic imitations of the aristocrats and I assume the aristocrats didnt tolerate this too well. The bourgeois, in my opinion, proved to be poor leaders that had one vision, to be exact replicas of the aristocratic class. The aristocrats also donated their funds in ways that the bourgeois class could not. The aristocrats basically funded the entire industrial revolution. The industrial revolution meant enormous changes throughout Britain. This amazing, prosperous revolution was made possible by the aristocrats. The aristocrats selflessly donated their monetary funds to the building of factories. The bourgeois also helped by funding factories, but it was purely for the money. In my opinion, the aristocrats were more willing to give up their money for the sake of the well-being of the country. The other classes involved with the industrial revolution were the highly important working class and the peasants. The working class may have been the most important and predominant class in the nineteenth century. The industrial revolution would never have happened without the monetary funds from the aristocrats and the workers from the working class. They provided the country with millions of workers whether they be high skilled or totally unskilled. They were all willing to work and to pave the way for industrialization yet to come. These workers stepped off the farm and into city life without looking back all for the hope that they would work in a factory and make better wages to help support their families. The working class strived to achieve bourgeois status, working hard everyday. In this aspect, I feel that the bourgeois was effective in that, without knowing it, they were role models for the lower classes. Skilled workers came closer to achieving their desired status day by day, earning money by utilizing their skill. The working...
