Data Bases
Custom Term Papers
Free Term Papers
Free Research Papers
Free Essays
Free Book Reports
Plagiarism?
Links
Top 100 Term Paper Sites
Top 25 Essay Sites
Top 50 Essay Sites
Search 97,000 Papers @ DirectEssays.com
Search 101,000 Papers @ ExampleEssays.com
Search 90,000 Papers @ MegaEssays.com
Free Essays
Term Paper Sites
Chuck III's Free Essays
Free College Essays
TermPaperSites.com
My Term Papers
Get Free Essays
Essay World
Planet Papers
Search Lots of Essays
Back to Subjects
-
History Other
zoroaster
zoroaster Judaism and Christianity are both major monotheistic religions in today's world. Upon taking a closer look at these western religions one can't help but notice a common thread running through them. The concepts of "one omniscient God" (monotheism) and "final judgement" (resulting in spending an eternity in heaven or hell), are ever present. How do these largely practiced belief systems have so much in common? Who is responsible for creating the basic ideology of millions of believers today? The answer to these questions may lie with a man who lived, possibly, thirty-five hundred years ago. Zoroastrians are the followers of the Achaemenian prophet or priest Zarathustra (or Zoroaster as the Greeks called him). (For clarification, I will use present day Iran in place of the Achaemenian Empire). Due to invasions of Iran and the destruction of their libraries, there are no sources to pinpoint the exact time frame of Zoroaster's life. According to documents that survived the eradication, Zoroaster flourished "…258 years before Alexander the Great..."(Frye 27). Alexander the Great sacked the Iranian capitol in 330 BC. Subtracting 258 years from that date would conclude the prophet was born circa 628 BC. Other scholars estimate his birth around 1400 BC. Where Zoroaster was born and lived is almost as uncertain as when he lived. Arab scripts state that "...Zaratusht arose from Ragh..." which researchers have concluded as Rhages, or present day Tehran Iran. (Finegan 86) The area in which he lived had an economy based on animal husbandry. Nomads who frequently raided those people were viewed by Zoroaster as evil men, and called them "followers of the lie". So begins the basis of Zoroaster's theology. To understand the overwhelming effect Zoroastrianism had on the people of the ancient Middle East, one must look at their belief system. Iran, as well as the entire Middle East, was a land where many pagan gods and goddesses were being "born". During the time of Zoroaster, Mithra was one prominent religion practiced by the Iranians. Those who were followers of Mithra (as well as other religions) would sacrifice animals to pay homage to their gods. It wasn't uncommon for worshippers to consume narcotics and intoxicating beverages called Haoma (Zaehner 38). Zoroaster's revolt against such ritualistic practices in Mithra and other Iranian religions is noted when he cried out to Ahura Mazda for help. " 'When wilt thou strike down this filthy drunkness,' the prophet exclaims, 'with which the priests (karapans) evilly delude (the people) as do the wicked rulers of the providences in (full) consciousness (of what they do).' " (Zaehner 38) In response, Zoroaster had received a vision from Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord, who appointed him to teach the truth. Initially, Zoroaster did not try to overthrow current religions. But instead he placed Ahura Mazda as the "Head God". Through his attempts to slowly reform the Iranian religions, Zoroaster was opposed in his monotheistic teachings and principles by religious authorities in the area that he preached. His enemies were the established civil and religious heads who wanted no part in undoing the ancient national religions, which had strong ties in existing social and economic structures. Zoroaster testifies: "Where and which part of land shall I go succeed? They keep me away from the family and the tribe. The community that I wish to join does not gratify me, nor do the deceitful tyrants of the land. How shall I gratify you, O Ahura Mazda?" (Clark 3) It can be deduced that he was persecuted by religious and civil leaders and in turn escaped from his homeland. Researchers indicate that Zoroaster appealed to one of the great leaders of his time called King Vishtaspa (the great grandson of Xerxes of Greece) (Finegan 83). The king along with a few others, (who included some family), became followers and began spreading the word of Zoroastrianism. The basis of Zoroaster's teachings seem to revolve around the idea that all events in the world are based on cause and effect. He has based his teachings on three principles: good reflection, good word and good behavior. Zoroaster believed that all the motives of human beings are based on action and reaction. Therefore, if human beings act favorably, they will in turn receive favorable actions and vice versa. Zoroaster's god was a god who was neither a bribe taker nor a dealer. Ahura Mazda, as told by Zoroaster, did not need to be flattered by his creatures in ritualistic sacrifices (Zaehner 85); neither did he need to be bought with bribes of expensive offerings. (Wadia 53-56) The god of Zoroaster is a god of justice, kindness and truthfulness. Ahura Mazda, in turn, guides his people to practice the same principles, because no man is more worthy than the other is. That is why Zoroaster has based his theology on good reflection, good word and good deed. Contrary to some religions practiced at that time, Zoroastrians are not predetermined in their fate to either eternal happiness or everlasting damnation. According to the Avesta (Zoroasterian scripture), everybody has the liberty to choose the `right' or `wrong'. This idea of free will may have taken root in the home community of Zoroaster as described in the Gathas (Zoroastrian hymns). The Gathas tells the story of a peaceful pastoral and cattle breeding society (presumably Zoroaster's) which was constantly raided by fierce nomadic tribes. The latter Zoroaster constantly refers to as dregvants (the followers of the Lie). He referred to his own people as the ashavants (the followers of Truth). (Zaehner 34) "Zoroastrianism proposes an ethical dualism, implying a radical choice made between good and evil, exemplified by these two spirits..." (dreg and asha). (Clark 9) Yet not only does Zoroaster present an ethical dualism, but also a religious one as well. The monotheistic basis of Zoroaster's teaching appears to be dualistic. Ahura Mazda appears to have an opposing (evil) force. Zoroaster taught that in the beginning there was a meeting of two spirits, who were free to choose "life or not life." This original choice gave birth good spirit (Spenta Mainyu) and evil spirit(Angra Mainyu). (Clark 7) Monotheism, however, prevails over ethical and religious dualism because Ahura Mazda is actually comprised of both spirits, who were divided into the two opposed principles through their own choice and decision pitted in an eternal struggle. (Clark 6-10) At the beginning of time, the world was divided into the dominion of the good and of the evil. Between these, each man is bound to decide. From man's freedom of decision, he alone is responsible for his fate. Through his good deeds, the righteous person earns an everlasting reward. He who opts for evil is condemned by Ahura Mazda and must expect to descend to the Christian concept of hell. Ahura Mazda is said to eventually vanquish the spirit of evil. This is done in similar fashion as the Christian religion, where there is a final internal confrontation where the good spirit, Spenta Mainyu, destroys the evil spirit. Zoroaster's monotheistic solution had replaced the idea of dualism. (Zaehner 54-57) Not many stories have been recorded about teachings that Zoroaster supplied to his followers. Zoroastrianism had eventually grown popular among the Iranian people but had still received opposition from other religious heads. Several attempts were made by opposing religions to uproot the new theology. Some religious leaders tried to discredit the Zoroastrians by accusing them of being "fire worshippers". Zoroaster didn't believe in anthropomorphism, so he chose to symbolize his god with fire. Zoroaster considered "light" and "fire" to be the cleanest phenomena in the earth therefore he chose them to be the symbol of Ahura Mazda. Unfortunately, some people out of wickedness or mere misunderstanding regarded Zoroastrianism as a fire-worshipping religion. The accusations not only damaged the theological basis, but also put holes in follower's faith. Even today, the followers of Zoroaster are ridiculed as "fire worshipers". (Waida 47, Clark 93) Zoroaster's death appears to be as sketchy as his birth. Currently there are several possible accounts of the prophet’s death; two are relatively similar in effect, but vary in tiny details. One account states that he was murdered by a rival priest while attending to his regular rituals. The other recorded possibility is that Zoroaster was slain, along with other priests, by the rival priests (Kavis) during a raid on a Zoroastrian sanctuary. Not all texts make a claim for a violent death. One researcher reports that Zoroaster’s “departure…to the best existence, when seventy-seven years had elapsed onwards from his birth”. (Clark 24) Gaining of power through the name of God, and sacrificing of animals, were both large sources of income for other religious leaders. Zarathustra’s three principles of good reflection, good words, and good deed; lead to eternal life. Therefore, there was no need for religious leaders to assume the role of mediator between God and people like other religions. Zarathustra beliefs even deprived the clergies from the temples that they had built. As these priests were deprived of their followers and money, they developed animosity toward Zoroastrianism. After Zoroaster’s death, priests of other religions incorporated Ahura Mazda to their own religions in hopes of winning Zoroaster’s people and money. In this manner, the religion of Mithra became so popular in Iran that even King Xerxes (of Greece) was worshiping Mithra next to Ahura Mazda. A century later, Alexander of Macedonia ordered his army to set fire to libraries of Iran. The destruction of didactic literature is why history in that area is so ambiguous. Due to continued persecution and many hardships, Zoroastrians were scattered throughout the Middle East. Zoroaster’s philosophy was transferred person-to-person, which has caused many alterations that may not be inline with true Zoroastrianism. What direct effects Zoroastrianism had on later Judeo-Christian religions can not be said for certain. "Zoroaster's doctrine of rewards and punishments, of an eternal bliss and an eternity of woe allotted to good and evil men in another life beyond the grave is so strikingly similar to (Judeo-Christian) teaching that we cannot fail to ask whether here at least there is not a direct influence at work. "For the similarities are so great and the historical context so neatly apposite that it would be carrying skepticism altogether too far to refuse to draw the obvious conclusion." (Zaehner 57) Since Zoroastrianism was developed somewhere between 100 - 900 years before Judaism and Jews had direct interaction with Iranians, it can be concluded that Iranians influenced the Jews, especially in the ways of religion. (Clark 162) It can then be said that Zoroastrianism was the basis for Christianity as well as Judaism, since Judaism held the founding principles for Christianity. Zoroastrianism in today's world finds itself at a constant state of change. As with many other religions, Zoroastrians have been forced to conform their religious communities due to pressures and ideals of the modern world. There is much questioning of traditional values and practices prompted by "…members of other faiths, spurred on largely by the electronic age, fast frequent transport and mass communication…" and "…has encouraged many Zoroastrians to embark upon a reappraisal of hitherto accepted theological, cultural and liturgical norms." (Clark 137) Today, the Zoroastrian community consists of 130,000 - 150,000 individuals. Most of the followers live in India, Iran and various parts of the western world. Though the numbers may be relatively small in comparison to today's population, the impact that Zoroaster has created on today's monotheistic religions is enormous. Bibliography: Bibliography Clark, Peter. Zoroastrianism: An Introduction to an Ancient Faith. Brighton, Portland: Sussex Academy Press, 1998. Dawson, Miles. The Ethical Religion of Zoroaster. New York: Ams Press, 1969. Finegan, Jack. The Archeology of World Religions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. Frye, Richard. The Heritage of Persia. Cleveland: The World Publishing Company, 1963. Wadia, Ardaser. The Message of Zoroaster. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., (copyright unknown). Zaehner, R.C.. The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism. New York: G.P. Putman's Sons, 1961.
Word Count: 1902
Copyright © 2005
College Term Papers
, INC All Rights Reserved.