l being used today. Granted they are different degrees of shaming. But the original concept and idea are still true to their original form. Instead of offenses of blasphemy and adultery, shaming is now used for such criminal acts as driving under the influence, theft, soliciting prostitution, and battery. Far away from the days of the stockade and the whipping post, now signs in front yards, cleansing of public roads, and other modern forms of shaming have now been implemented in modern day probation. Along with the change in eras, comes a whole new course of legal issues that have been raised by offenders. Does shaming violate an offender’s constitutional right and does shaming serve its intended purpose? There are many individuals that feel shaming violates a persons 1st and 8th amendments in the United States Constitution and this same question has been brought up in the courts. But every time, the courts have ruled that there is no violation of constitutional rights and the idea of shaming offenders has been upheld. Until there has been the implementation of a better plan or concept, I for one feel that the concept of shaming is a warranted and just act. ...
