rxs opinion.According to Marx after this violent revolution people would come together and help one another. People would be valued on the basis of how much they could produce. In other words, Who ever produced the most would be highly revered amongst all the other communists, and then this highly revered person would then keep only what he needed from what he produced and give the rest to those who needed it most. Everything would be wonderful in communist society. People would do what needed to be done, and they wouldnt even need a leader. A leader might be necessary in the very beginning right after revolt to put things in order, but shortly after that the leaders services would be unneeded. This is also assuming that the leader would just give up his power, and live right along side his fellow communist.From what I can gather, Marx expected the working class to kill off all the owners of production. This way the only people that were left in the nation would be more then happy to work, as long as they were not being oppressed. A problem I see with this, is that unless the working class is incredibly inclined to revolt, Marxs plan will never actually happen. Chances are that the working class would probably keep right on working, as opposed to taking up arms and risking their lives to kill their bosses.I understand where Marx is coming from, because he witnessed the horrors that came about because of the industrial revolution. In the beginning of the industrial revolution the people who owned the means of production had absolute control over wages and working conditions of their employees. No laws were yet in place deal with the situation, so employers were free to pay workers pennies an hour. A surplus of people needing work meant, that if some one was not willing to work for the wage offered, there was always someone else to take their place. There were also no laws in place to compensate workers that were injured on th...
