ifficult to follow in terms of all else but for the specifications and monetary figures which he lays out extremely well. Finally Peden's points are convincing in terms of raw facts, but he lacks emphasis on the underlying characters involved in the Avro Arrow project. On the hold this critique has discussed the biases, cohesion of ideas and the effectiveness of Peden's points. Furthermore, this paper has illustrated the value and shortcomings of Peden's book, Fall of an Arrow, in terms of it's worth as a historical source. While it is stipulated that there is much useful information and quality arguments formulated by Peden, there assumes too much knowledge on the part of the reader....
