tenced to life without chance of parole,and society will be just as safe as if he had been executed. A vast misconception concerning the death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keepinginmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the courtappeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn-out and very expensive process.The average time between sentencing and execution for the 31 prisoners put on death row in1992 was 114 months, or nine and a half years.(Stewart 50) Criminal justice process expenses,trial court costs, appellate and post-conviction costs, and prison costs perhaps including yearsserved on death row awaiting execution... all told, the extra costs per death penalty imposed inover a quarter million dollars, and per execution exceeds $2 million. (Cavanagh 4) When youcompare this to the average costs for a twenty year prison term for first degree murder (roughly$330 thousand), the cost of putting someone away for life is a deal. Is it really worth the hassleand money to kill a criminal, when we can put them away for life for less money with a great dealmore ease?In earlier times--where capital punishment was common, the value of life was less, and societieswere more barbaric--capital punishment was probably quite acceptable. However, in todayssociety, which is becoming ever more increasingly humanitarian, and individual rights and dueprocess of justice are held in high accord, the death penalty is becoming an unrealistic form ofpunishment. Also, with the ever present possibility of mistaken execution, there will remain thequestion of innocence of those put to death. Finally, man is not a divine being. He does not havethe right to inflict mortal punishment in the name of societys welfare, when there are suitablesubstitutes that require fewer resources. I ask society, ...why dont we stop the killing?(Grisham404)...
