s very interesting because he answered the survey except on the fish question. Although he put "beats me" he still answered with a definition copied from the Britannica website. He was the only response that I received on that day. I checked the email again on April 24th and noticed that he emailed me back. On his second email, he gave an addition to the question concerning fish being animals. He copied a chart from their docent reference manual about major classification groups. It seemed as if the fish question really bothered him and he wanted to find out more information. In a way I thought this was amusing because I never expected anyone to really look up information for me. I received two more emails that day from two of the schools and finally got my last email later that day. This last email was quite different from the rest because he had asked not to be identified in my report. He also made the comment that I might get more responses if I had indicated whether or not their responses would be kept confidential. I had never thought about mentioning that on the survey until he brought it up. The main part of his email that was really different from everyone else is that he asked if I had IRB approval to do research involving human subjects (i.e. those I am surveying). I had no idea what he was talking about so that led me to search IRB approval. I found a website that explained what IRB was and according to it I did not have to have approval because classroom research does not meet the IRB's definition of research. This was the last of my responses and I found all of them to be unique and different. They were very helpful in my findings in one way or another. This ended my journey for finding resources to help answer my questions. Findings: Gathering all the information from the books, databases and interviews led to the findings of my search. There are different views to whether animals can dream or not. Acco...
