some members from each side are commonly concerned about postcoital contraceptives promoting promiscuity. The views held by all the persons involved this debate provide grounds for analysis of the justifications backing their arguments.The consequences, whether good or bad, stemming from the real actions of emergency contraceptives are at the center of the debate over their use. The main directives in each portion of either the proponents’ or opponents’ opinions come from the societal, economic, and medical implications of the benefits and or harms of this means of birth control. Criterion established by each faction shows how emergency contraception affects all areas of the world population.The most important effect that these drugs present is the potential for postcoital contraceptives to replace conventional contraceptives that are currently used by family planning organizations. This outcome is an even more possible reality because of the medication used for emergency contraception. The drugs prescribed for emergency contraception are the same as those used for conventional birth control; therefore, women who have been prescribed traditional birth control can take them after intercourse instead of regularly as prescribed. This poses a major economic problem for governmental health agencies because they would have to allocate additional funds to offer such drugs. In case they were able to do so, the increased usage of emergency contraceptive agents could promote unsafe sex, causing more diseases and more occurrences of sex in the population. Based upon the potential harms toward the entire population, these consequences, developing from the economic/medical/societal impact of these medications, define the criterion in which health organizations find valid grounds to oppose the use of these particular preventatives of conception. The supporters of emergency contraceptives state that the purpose of postcoital contra...
