ng rays of reality but it doesn't change the fact that one can still get to see the light of that glare. However, the glare of the light is no longer of the same magnitude as it was without the shade. The difference in the light's magnitude somehow makes one fretful or worried as awareness sinks in since critical observation is at work. And where the mind achieves a perfect amity with sense, shows that the mind is comfortable with the image that it is seeing because for the mind the image creates a perfect amity or harmony, thus making sense. And so the question rears up, serpent from the charmer's box: What is that splendid suddenness of city streets? Whatever it is that is in the charmer's box is suppose to enchant but by the very presence of a serpent, the enchantment is now turned into deception, because the idea of a serpent is a symbol of deception, indicative of an illusion, thus it goes against the very idea of a charmer's box, which is a contradiction. This contradiction of having a serpent in a charmer's box, in turn, makes one wonder of the abrupt presence of impressive city streets. The unexpected occurrence of city streets is somehow being questioned. Is it presence, or a vision? Is it a reality? Or is it just an illusion? Is what one seeing the product of one's imagination? Or is it the truth? Or the absent din of men nowhere and faceless? Trapped inside a paradox? This means that there is difficulty in identifying what is real from the illusion. The men who are caught in this dichotomy is somewhat lost and thus, just keep quiet as seen from the phrase absent din of men, leaving themselves to be entangled in the conflict of determining illusion from reality, thus the paradox. But who is to say how the mind achieves the conjunction of belief with leaf? Belief here connotes to what is perceived to be real and true, while the leaf refers to what is really real. But how does one tell or explain the concurrence of t...
