tivity seems to spill over into mainstream society as same sex couples are seen strolling the streets arm in arm, kissing, and even engaging in unsightly groping. Homosexuals display such behavior proudly during their various ‘equal rights’ marches. It seems analogous to lobbying for a new car while driving a Ferrari, no one will listen because they are all turned off by your actions. Often enough, homosexual’s attempt to ‘pick up’ straight members of their own sex, causing considerable uneasiness. Having to deal with a homosexual on such an insignificant occasion as buying bread can easily make one’s skin crawl, if not ruin one’s day. The feminine voice, dress, coupled with their feminine movements, can provide considerable incentive to avoid such people. The foregoing details the general appearance of homosexuals. There are of course exceptions to this rule, and these members of the homosexual group are not quite as prevalent in every day life. It cannot be denied that viewing this activity will offend many, if not the majority of mainstream society. The allowance of homosexual activity, providing it is kept from the public eye, has for the most part failed in its initiative. Few straight people could truly say they have never been exposed to such moral erosion. Such erosion becomes even more prevalent when the issues of adoption and marriage are considered. Even those homosexuals that do not parade about in joyous display of their sexuality are included in those wishing to become parents and spouses under the law. The argument often heard is that homosexuals are not perverts, that the children they raise will be fine. They claim that homosexuality in and of itself does not make one an inherently poor parent. This seems quite ridiculous when you consider the issue from the child’s point of view rather than that of the homosexual, whom would obviously be thrilled to raise a ch...
