of Chicago Press, 1983).[2] George Kateb, The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992); see also, e.g., Ronald Dworkin,Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978); StephenMacedo, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in LiberalConstitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).[3] Weber, Economy and Society, op. cit., p. 922.[4] Berger, op. cit.[5] Taylor, "Cross-Purposes," op. cit., p. 165.[6] Ibid., p. 165.[7] Tocqueville, op. cit., in note 4, p. 103.[8] Taylor, "Cross-Purposes," p. 175.[9] Ibid., p. 170 (emphasis added).[10] MacIntyre, "Is Patriotism a Virtue?," op. cit., p. 16.[11] Ibid., p. 13.[12] This is not to say that this is necessarily MacIntyre's personalconception of "the nation." This is simply his account of the way that strongnationalists conceive of the nation with which he may or may not himselfidentify.[13] Ibid., p. 19. [14] See, ibid., pp. 10-11. [15] Charles Taylor, "Why Do Nations Have to Become States?," Guy Laforest,ed., Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism(Montreal: McGill-Queems University Press, 1993), p. 45.[16] Michael Walzer, "The Idea of Civil Society: A Path to SocialReconstruction," Dissent (1991), p. 300....
