all the gossip in womens magazines. We [the paparazzi] are made into the scapegoats but everyone is to blame. Needless to say if it wasnt in human nature to turn toward pleasure and away from pain; to prefer the sweet to the bitter; to respond to the cheerful and shun to the severe, to lament 'all the bad news in the media and demand more good news then there would be no such thing as the paparazzi. People in the community basically pay the paparazzi. If they wouldnt be so interested in other peoples lives then the paparazzi wouldnt be such a threat.The last group of people that could prevent the paparazzi is the paparazzi themselves. According to a member of the paparazzi, celebrities lover to invite you to take their picture. They say tell your people to buy my book, see my film or support my charity. They love the publicity until they are going out and then its different. Diana would invite certain media along for her own purpose. When you start doing that youre increasing their interest in you. Naturally we cant ban the paparazzi from everyone during every function, but everyone knows that they shouldnt show up at a function unless they were invited. The paparazzi should also back off a celebrity when they see that he/she is getting angry. As with Princess Diana on her ski trip when for the first time, the twenty-one-year old princess showed her anger. As 'People [magazine] put it: Shy Di was no longer bashful about her preference for privacy. On and off the slopes, Diana was uncharacteristically icy to the pursing paparazzi. The same goes for her death; many people blame the paparazzi for causing it, which may be the case. When Princess Dianas driver started speeding and trying to get away from them they should have stopped. Not only did their ignorance kill her but it also endangered their lives and everyone elses.In conclusion until the Paparazzi ceases to exploit the enterta...
