issed in the review was special effects. Special effects are an important part of a movie, also. What can't be done while being filmed can be inserted by computer, and without that, it can be difficult to do some movies. Were there any special effects that are notable in this movie?A passage that was hard to understand at first was "There's the usual its elaborate choreography concealed in peppy verve." This passage was referring to a previous sentence in the paragraph, "The first film had Chan playing the fish out of water in Los Angeles. This one reverses the pattern, beginning with Tucker experiencing culture shock as a visitor in Hong Kong." The passage was referring to the stuff that had happened in the last movie that is the same in the sequel will be covered up with action.I haven't seen this film yet. I was already interested in seeing it though, and the review did not change much in my opinion. It didn't make me want to see the movie any more or not see it at all. The Review should have been more specific in many areas, and should have elaborated more on many points. Should have discussed sound, directing, camera angles, and special effects....
