reconsider his opinion, depending on how Joe comes to make his choice. Singer uses detailed definitions when arguing his case. He extends the definition of ‘human’, and ‘person’. Average Joe takes other peoples ideas and uses those to identify his own feelings. He uses politics and writings of other philosophers like Singer. When Joe would say he is against abortion, Singer would ask why. Joes response would be nowhere near in depth and detailed as Singer’s.If you were to read Singers definitions, and assume that most people would consider his definitions accurate then Joe would not be able to defend his argument in a respective way. Singer says those who protest against abortion but dine regularly on the bodies of chickens, pigs, and calves, show only a biased concern for the lives of members of our own species. We know that average Joe generally approves of the killing and eating of animals. Singer would contest Joes abortion side by referring to this statement. This takes the credibility of Joes not killing the unborn. Singer says fish would become a greater controversy than that of humans.V...
