sie gains more and more control, families like X have their income driven down and ultimately have fewer children. Families must have enough money, food, etc. to survive. If they don’t have these goods and they can’t control their wages, they must control they must control an aspect of their lives that would allow them to survive, whether or not to have children. Family Z is an extremely wealthy family that more or less monopolizes an aspect of their economy. As the economy progresses, family Z is able to drive down the wages of their workers thereby increasing their profit. Since a family like Z is only a small percent of the population, there is no worry whether or not they have many children. So in our society, according to Marx, we have nothing to worry about. As long as we continue with our economic trend, population will fix itself. Now if you look at Marx’s theory on the whole, it makes a lot of sense. MALTHUS 1766-1834 Malthus was a sociologist that was the author of Population: the first essay. This essay is about the perfection of mankind. Malthus describes the different stages that man has gone through and he provides theory to control population. Malthus was sure that we can control population if we are able to use moral restraint. If we can fight against our natural urges to have children, it will keep population growth in check. One of the reasons that we have to control our natural urges is that there will not be enough food to support our population. Maltus feels this way because population grows at a geometric rate, while food can only be grown at an arithmetic rate. So we are in effect sealing our own fate by having children. Malthus says that by thinking about all of the hardships that our children will have to face, we will be motivated not to have them. So while Marz’s theory more or less happens on it’s own, if we are to listen to Malthus some work is to needed by us. WELD Weld is a co...
