Int rise invest fall. Rate of growth since 1980GDP C + I + G + XConsumptionInvestment -factories- inventories –equipment –GovernmentExport & import GDP deflatorCPIREAL & Nominal GDPInflation rateStart with 1980 what lead to the problems in the 1980’s, Economic problems and how it dealt with themRetail sales home sales scarcity Social HealthInfant mortalityDrug abuseHigh school dropoutsPoverty of those over 65Food stampsChild abuseUnemploymentGap bt rich and poorIndustrial development to help distribution of wealth and economic stabilityInflation RecessionEconomic reforms 1990’s privatization macroeconomics--how it affected the public sector's financial position and the current account--and the process--how privatization was implemented. The literature has also assessed its impact on efficiency, When regulators are effective, operational gains (in efficiency, productivity, quality, and tariff cuts) clearly benefit all sectors (except agriculture, forestry, and fisheries) and all income classes--and the poorest tend to gain relatively more than other income groups. The gains add up to about 1.25 percent of GDP a year. When regulators are ineffective--that is, when they do not ensure that the quasi rent generated by pivatization is redistributed throughout the economy rather than retained by the owners of the privatized utilities--more sectors lose, and although all income classes still gain, they gain less than when regulators are effective. Thus ineffective regulation reduces the gains from privatization. The gains that resulted from the macroeconomic effects of privatizing utilities were not strong enough to offset the negative efficiency and distributional effects that resulted from the tequila effect.Labor unrest political violence and deep divisions of peronista party wifeOne of highest per capita incomes in south America wealth is fairly distributedBased on agriculture and...
