more exist, one the of countries, the U.S. or USSR, would try to persuade the third country to join their team. By having only one entity controlling the nuclear weapons, such as the U.N., then problems could arise. One, the countries deprived of the nuclear prize, in which they would try to get the prize back anyway they could: theft, illegal development, or black market. Another problem with nuclear weapons is when to use them. The U.N. is primarily a peace keeping organization. The thought of using a mass destruction weapon would come up only if another country had illegally come up with a nuclear weapon or a country threatened the entire world with their acts of war. Then weapons would sit and waste away, being a symbol for all the countries as a forbidden fruit. Having the U.N. as the sole authority for the weapons would subvert peace. Nothing would get done because the one country desperately trying to get the nuclear prize would undermine the whole idea of the U.N. and peacekeeping. The resentment brought by the lack of the prize would cause one of the nuclear team to go againist the ideas of the U.N. solely because they no longer have the nuclear weapons.As seen as a tool for peace, even though it is a weapon of mass destruction, the nuclear bomb can exist in the world peaceably. Once introduced into this world, the thought or theory can not be reversed. The thought of disarmament is ludicrous and totally unrealistic. The countries with the nuclear capabilities would never want to give it up, and if they did, one can be certain that they will keep some hidden from view or lie about the actual number of weapons....
