death to the total discretion of the jury violated the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. McGauthas appeal was denied, and the Supreme Court gave juries the discretion to impose either a life sentence or the death penalty. A jury could now inflict a death sentence without taking into account the circumstances of the case or the situations involved. It allowed a jury to find a person guilty and then, in the absence of any guidance or direction, decide if that person should live or die. This is giving the juries too much power in deciding if the death penalty fits the crime. This also gives the jury the opportunity to get emotionally involved in the trial and hand down a death sentence to an innocent person.Furman v. Georgia was brought to the Supreme Court on the basis that juries imposed the death penalty in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner. This is a result of the decision in the case of McGautha v. California, which gave the jury freedom to use their own discretion in imposing the death penalty. These cases made the death penalty cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment.1 (references of www.deathpenalty.org). Justice Potter Stewart commented on the arbitrarily imposed death penalty by saying, These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lighting is cruel and unusual. 2 (Congressional Quartely Inc.) Furman violated the death penalty in all 32 states and removed 629 people from death rows.2 (Congressional Quartely Inc.). This was the first time in American history that the death penalty was officially voided by the Supreme Court. States eventually composed death penalty laws that met with the complaints of Furman v. Georgia, and the death penalty was reinstated as constitutional.Many problems were still argued over the constitutionality of the death penalty. In 1984, Pulley v. Harris, it was argued that proportionality reviews are constitutionally required to prevent...
