al, but that’s another speech.D. I tend to think that younger more educated kids are safer to drink than the underage and undereducated ones of today. E. There is still going to be problems with drinking and driving, so we should also come up with stricter penalties for drunk drivers. 1. Harsher laws for first time offenders and repeat offenders.2. People should be educated about drinking in order to better understand the effects.F. European countries such as France and Italy have no underage drinking laws in place.1. They have far fewer problems with alcoholism and teenage binge drinking.2. Because “its been a part of every persons life since child hood so threes no allure to be bad and drink. “G. If the age were lowered people would have to take responsibility and take a few steps to make it work. 1. First, you would have to realize that we have a big problem with drinking under age and that the only way that we can solve that is by stop ignoring it. Also we should start educate our friends, families…our kids, about alcohol abuse, and teach them how to drink safe, instead punishing them. 2. Secondly, I would ask that our culture take the time to educate our kids in the future about the effects of drinking on people, through advertising campaigns and schools. In conclusionA. The drinking age should be lowered because the current age has no real basis. B. It has worked in many other countires, and with a lowered drinking age, fewer problems will be present in ours as well.C. We need to teach safe drinking-drinking in moderation. I feel that the problems, which make a drinking age limit necessary, are better solved through a lowered drinking age. Thank you! October 6, 1997 issue of Time magazine on page 112, titled "The New Prohibitionism," written by Charles Krauthammer)., “It is not obvious that learning to drink with moderation, and not to drive when one is drinking, automatically happens to a twenty-o...
