contributions is greater than the negative effects the company may bring. Although such a doctrine exists, it does not apply to Napster because Napster infringes on the laws of the constitution. Clearly, breaking the law cannot be excused and must be punished. Although the invention of Napster is a bright innovation, it can be put to much better use. It is amazing how many people can trade and store information with just one program. Yet, I believe that it is discerning to see it go against the constitution, which makes it a very serious problem. As I type, people all over the country are downloading songs that they did not pay for and it will continue until we put a stop to it. If technology leads to the breaking down of the laws, which have been set forth to protect us, it should be destroyed. No matter how great and amazing the invention may be, we cannot have it threaten the constitution which we have shed blood to write.Competency #7Controversial Issue“Napster Vs. Constitution”...
