e wisdom of such a rejection of the proposed referendum. Granted, to say that this is the only alternative is indeed a stretch, however, the point is that the deepening of the E.U. is of absolute importance, whether it be by Maastricht or another means. As Germany grows in stature, the Germans are bound to feel that their role is changing, especially with the developments in Eastern Europe and beyond. These developments have created a power vacuum through which Germany will naturally feel the need to lead in "safe-guarding" order. It is the nature of politics to say that as German power grows so will German influence, the only peaceful alternative and answer to the German question is the E.U. Only, that is, if the E.U. remains elastic to always contain but not hinder the growth of its members, especially Germany. This brings the argument to ask the question of whether there can be a European Germany or only a German Europe? This asks if Germany can be successfully and "properly" integrated with the rest of Europe. This is a nonsensical question which is self defeating. Are the Germans some sort of special breed of humanity which make them inherently above the law? Alfred Baring, a German Historian, is referred to as accusing his "fellow citizen of a laxness bordering on irresponsible." Stating that, "Germans have been political lightweights for forty years and want to stay that way." Continuing that, "Germany has been living in an idyllic situation in which it has not had to challenge itself and think of its role in Europe." Germany is as much of a part of Europe as France or Italy. Each nation-state has a position and a role to play in the E.U.. To discard Germany as being overbearing and dominant, placing it on the shelf will simply not work. Giving Germany a monopoly on political an economic policy making is also foolish. This argument is not about creating a fourth German empire. Germany ha...
