ood special-effects lab, especially for the time that this film is dated at. Dr. Paul O'Higgins, an anatomist from University College London, says, the anatomy appears human, though with several deformities. The large skull, he says, could be caused by fluid on the brain, often found together with low set ears, hairlessness, and lack of secondary sexual characteristics. On an anatomical and evolutionary basis, I find it impossible to believe these are aliens. Only the lack of a navel and the black membrane over the eyes bewilder me. (qtd. in Walker 38)This is the same opinion that many researchers share, they don't believe that the being is an alien, but there are so many things unexplained on the films that have no other explanation but for the being to actually be extraterrestrial. Researchers of the Roswell incident feel that it is highly probable that the government is withholding information on the crash. For a lot of the researchers, their primary goal is to get the matter into the open so that the truth can be conclusively determined, one way or another. Another thing that would help is finding the cameraman. There are many disputed questions that scientists want to ask him about the films. Questions that will probably never be answered unless he steps forward. Obviously something had to have happened at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947, but the truth might never come out. So until it does, people can share their thoughts and stories, whether fact or fiction, and enjoy the memories of the most celebrated and best documented UFO event of all time. They can keep their wild ideas that somewhere in an alternate universe, Marvin and Mindy Martian are sitting down watching over us earthlings.Works CitedCorliss, Richard. "Autopsy or Fraud-topsy?" Time v146 27 Nov. 1995: 105.Jeffrey, Kent. "Time for the Truth About Roswell." http://www.islandnet.com/%7Ebfidler/ROSWELL/roswell.html (9 Dec. 1996)Montgomery, Ruth. Aliens Among Us. New York: G. ...
