ey, on the other hand we can have money but not our health. This sounds like a loss, loss situation. I don't see it that way; health is more important then money. People always can find another job or career but people can't get another body, so we must take care of it very carefully.If smoking is not banned the smokers will have to spend more money then for a pack of cigarette. The medical price. "The estimated average lifetime medical costs for a smoker exceed those for a nonsmoker by more than $6,000."(Machenzie 1995) That's a lot of money. It comes out of everybody's pockets, which not fair but that's life. "Studies have placed the cost of smoking for the United States as a whole at a staggering $65 billion in 1985 in terms of health care expenditures and lost productivity, a value that would surely exceed $100 billion in current dollars."(Machenzie 1995) "The cost savings that result because of the premature deaths of smokers through their lower social security and pension costs will more then compensate for the added costs imposed by smokers, chiefly through higher health insurance costs."(Mccuen 1997) The only way money will be saved is my death. This not the way anyone should want to save money."The tobacco industry has a problem: 435,000 of its loyal customers die every year. Fortunately for the industry, the one million young people who light up for the first time each year more than compensates for the consumer drain."(Aldrich 1995) I can't believe a company will target young people just to make a profit. The tobacco relies on the young people so much that they spend a lot of money on advertisement. "In 1992 cigarette companies spent 5.23 billion dollars in advertisement and promotion and is rising each year."(Mccuen 1997) Which more then one half was targeting young kids. "A 1992 national sample found that 87 percent of the adolescents surveyed could recall recently seeing one or more advertisements for toba...
