it since the environment does not have any substantive product. We may harvest resources from it, but that is not because the earth is working for us. Effort and The ideal method of distribution is a middle ground between basing it on need and equality. We ought to treat each type of ecosystem as equal to each other while understanding that there maintenance depend on different things. For now keeping the earth as diverse as possible should be a goal. Choosing methodologyEven though our relationship between us and nature may be an authoritarian one, our relationship with other humans are not. So when choosing an obligation of behavior we need to present a code that is inclusive of all and places the burden of caretakers on everyone. This sharing is the only practical method of truly making a difference and sustaining it. Moral obligation can be a powerful tool in persuading the public. No classical method can sustain the need for practicing environmental ethics. Deontology cannot work because in a global society, humans will not be able to agree on the deos part. The Social Contract Theory is involves relations between humans and not about the world around us. Utilitarianism is not ideal on its own, since saving the environment has no real utility and may not always bring us happiness. And last but not least, Kantian principles are simply not practical to impose on a large population, using that kind of moral autonomy would cause chaos and the metal gymnastic to get universal maxims is too complicated. We need to take positive aspects of each method and meld them into an obligation that has practical use with the general public. Deontology is singular in purpose and in this case we say preservation of the environment is good with the proof lying in scientific evidence. Our duties to protect the environment comes through our agreement to the Social Contract theory. We sacrifice some our freedoms in order to help the enviro...
