others, while miserably drifting through daily life dwelling on what could or might be. Men should live life according to his natural “Dionysian” instincts, and ignore society’s labeling of these values as “evil”. By finding a balance between Dionysian instincts and reason, man can destroy all ideas of morality and focus on finding his own true values. With this balance, the leaders of society could evaluate their present society and prompt its improvement. Nietzsche’s philosophy was dependent on the ranking of society and also on the fact that people of different places in life will have different truths to realize. The higher nobility (this nobility being based upon intellect and not economics) would go higher in success while the masses (again, dependent on intellectual factors) would further degenerate. Marx felt quite opposite in the sense that the proletariat was oppressed by the bourgeois and would eventually overpower them. This would lead to one large class of proletariat where all are the same and everyone is viewed equally. To Nietzsche, this would result in one large mess of people in equal amounts of misery. His idea of what makes an individual is in direct opposition to Marx’s ideas.For Marx and Nietzsche, the world and what is important in it are complete opposites. One man chooses to look at the internal differentiation of each man from the norm of society, while the other seeks to achieve one body of equal people through economic equivalence. They both saw that the world is full of constant conflict and change, and desired for a means of finding some type of solution. While Marx sees a certain and precise method of rectifying the world’s problems through the elimination of economic classes, Nietzsche is much more complex. His work is full of contradictions and unanswered questions. Nowhere does Nietzsche give guidance or assistance to his audience in picturin...
