the value judgments can be justified through a method that parallels procedures in disciplines. Will and Fran made their judgment not with moral values but with the values of themselves in mind. Intuitionism- Views value properties as unlike the factual properties to which naturalist’s appeal.Will and Fran viewed their values of having an abortion Lagana 3decided that it was wrong but they both felt like they had no choice but to have the abortion. Noncognitivism - Basically covers a wide variety of theories. Some theories that Will and Fran went through was if they did have the baby their parents might not help take care of them and their life's would be devoted to every minute of the child's life. Yet, if they had the abortion their worries would be all but gone.Emotivism- Briefly described ethics consist of a set of desires rather than a set of true or false statements. The ethics consisted in this case is when not whether it is morally right or wrong because they both know it is wrong, but to do what is in their own self-interest.Prescriptivism- Briefly described is the foundations of normative ethics as well as value judgments. The foundation of this case is the consequences of right and wrong and which decision will be better for them not thinking of no one else.IV-A) Values - Briefly described as emergence of needs. The emergences of needs in this case are whether or not they can handle the responsibilities of having and taking care of their baby.Intrinsic- Briefly described as important state of being. In this particular case, I do not see any intrinsic values. Health, honesty, responsibility, clear conscience are defiently some that are not in this case. Will and Fran show none of these characteristics in and after their decision making process.Extrinsic- Defined as activity of affair. The activity here is having the abortion. One extrinsic value used in this case is opinion. Will uses his opinion to pers...
