where very wrong traditions based on old philosophical questions in a way of understanding and explaining that questions. The history for this problem came from the religions. The problem was to understand the messages that Hermes transfer to the gods. Hermes played the role of messenger.-1st method was the tradition to which all the members tried to say what the were following in the tradition in a way of discussions.-The Roman empire was the next period, in which the civil discussions were reduced to law problems.-But a new kind of Hermeneoticals born in the 16th century as a Scientifical type. Here we have the first scientists who believed in natural sciences.-They were 3 logical types for translation. i. Theological (try to explain the relation with god), ii. Holistical (try to explain the relation of being quite), iii. Formal logic (to avoid the controversies. -Next generation born in 19th century. ’Dielthey’ said: you cannot understand anything without knowing the history. You have to translate, explain the phenomena as historical phenomena.-Later on a Sociological way of sciences came to moderate the history. Here we have the economical and political viewpoints. (Also psychological).-In the first half of 19th century we have to understand the process of understanding. First to understand the process of author, after the process of the public and third was the self-understanding.-Dielthey mentioned the relation between the emotion and psychological understanding. This was one of the criteria to understand ourselves.-In the first halves of 20th century ‘Martin Heidegger’ establish a new generation of translation and Hemeneotics. The central problem of understanding was to understand the term of being.-‘Gaddamer’ said that the understanding process is not individual but collective and social, and can happen through communication, conversation and dialogs.-‘Habermas’ said that the under...
