ally labour unions, churches, and cooperatives, should not have an unlimited control over the plurality of these private associations (Olson 111). Pluralism in a sense is the middle ground; it doesnt coincide with the nation state theory and it stays clear of the laissezfaire anarchistic extremes. Pluralism provides a cushion between the individual and the state (Olson 112). Pluralism is the perfect mix of active and passive citizenry, and power is bartered and shared between many different groups. On the other end of the spectrum is the theory of NeoPluralism, which consists of multiple pressure groups, but political agenda biased towards corporate power. Although pluralism seems more beneficial Neopluralism has its benefits such as economic prosperity, and the ability for leaders to meet the demands of the people. However, it destroys the realm of individual initiative and free enterprise. So in concurrence with Olson pluralism seems more beneficial to society.Group Size and Group BehaviourThe traditional theory of group behaviour that implicitly assumes that private groups and associations operate according to principles entirely different from those that governs the relationships among firms in the marketplace or between taxpayers and the state (Olson 16). Many different writers including Olson helped to invent this traditional theory that describes group behaviour and relates it to the marketplace. According to Olson the effectiveness of the size of a group directly correlates with the level of society. For instance if the society is modern, than the larger the group, the more effective it will be in obtaining collective goods. In a primitive society a small group would be more effective in obtaining these goods. Today in a modern society a larger group is more likely to accomplish goals that benefit the group.Rationality and Free RiderRationality appears to deal with the motives that drive a member of a latent or larg...
