s specifically warned by his teachers; or 3-the rudeness is so obvious that no specific notice was required. Nevertheless the evidence (school rule book, testimony by two of the three teachers whom he showed the speech prior to delivering it, and the fact that since it was his peers and he was speaking in their language) show that none of these three happened. It can be concluded that it was highly unlikely that he would have decided to give the speech had he known that it would result in severe punishment. Therefore, this dissenting opinion is against the majority ruling of the court....
